|
Heritage Council
Report
|
| Aboriginal Heritage |
History |
Buildings in 1999 |
Carvings |
Residents |
Natural Environment |
Conservation Plan |
North
Head Quarantine Station, Sydney Harbour National Park, Conservation Management
Plan
Dated: December 1999
|
# |
page |
section |
matters
to be addressed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
6-11* |
1.3 |
The legal land title information for the
‘Quarantine Station proper’ (lot/DP numbers, parish and county names)
needs to be included in this section. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
84ff |
5.3 |
This
section appears very heavily based on the 1991 Godden Mackay report and
has not been prepared by an archaeologist nor substantially revised. It
lacks any systematic survey of archaeological sites or identification of
zones of sensitivity, which had been present to a limited extent in the
previous CMP (see pages 32-36 of the 1992 CMP for example). It would be
preferable to have this integrated into the current CMP rather than as a
standalone ‘archaeological management strategy’. The archaeological
policies, however, while general in nature are sound. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
95-102 |
5.5.2 |
The surviving fabric of the funicular railway
needs to be identified, and the uses, dates, etc need to be included in
the text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
113-118 |
5.5.5 |
The surviving fabric of the public telephones
needs to be identified, and the uses, dates, etc need to be included in
the text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
134 |
5.10 |
Inclusion of a map of the Berry’s Bay Depot
precinct would be useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
189-192 |
7.6 |
Attention is drawn to the sections on Australian
quarantine stations in O’Keefe & Pearson Federation: a survey of heritage places (1998: 40) and Pearson et
al, National Federation Heritage
Project (1999: 23-25) for further comparative information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
200 |
7.8.3 |
Reference needs to be made to significant
contents/movable items on the site. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
205-207 |
7.8.4 |
A level of significance needs to be stated in the
Statement of Significance: in s8.2.1 North Head is assessed, as being of
National level significance – this section should support s8.2.1 with a
similar level; reference to the significance of the views to the site
should also be included in this section; the second-last paragraph on p207
should refer to racial segregation as well as class distinctions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
207 |
2.8.5 |
Spaces
and spatial functions need to be included in this assessment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
209-212 |
7.8.6 |
The contribution of each threatened species to
the significance of each precinct needs to be included. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
213-217 |
8.2 |
A
single, integrated statement of significance is required as well as the
tripartite statements; and change terms such as ‘pleasing’ and
‘interesting’ to ‘significant’ or a degree of significance.
The text referring to functions and layouts in paragraph 1, s8.4.4
should be included in the Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
217-223* |
8.3 |
Statutory obligations under the State Records Act 1998 with regard to the documentary collections
held at the site need to be identified; with appropriate policy and
implementation approaches developed (possibly as part of such approaches
to movable heritage and heritage objects). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
221 |
8.3.4 |
Paragraph 3: amend to read that …can exempt all works undertaken in accordance with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
227 |
8.4.2 |
‘Colonial/Modern’
– include reference to layout and spatial structure in first paragraph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
228-230 |
8.4.3 & 8.4.4 |
At
a casual reading policies 3 and 4 in section 9.5 could seem to be
contradictory. It is
recommended that the this section and the policies be reworded to
emphasise the distinction between reconstruction for interpretation
purposes and new construction for development purposes – the Burra
Charter definition of reconstruction is quite specific.
The purpose of a reconstruction needs to be clearly stated, and the
possibility of a balance between the two purposes explored: group
accommodation and conference/seminar facilities may not necessarily
conflict with interpretation – the provision of services, however, may
be an issue for such structures, and should also be considered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
230 |
8.4.4 |
Include new references to materials, bulk and
height, as well as scale and form; and to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
230-231 |
8.4.5 |
A
reference must be included to preparing supplementary CDs (especially
‘high priority’ CDs, such as for precincts) before uses for the
precincts and elements are determined, so that their significance guides
their planning rather than proposed new uses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
233 |
8.5.5 |
Amend first sentence to read …the significance of the artefacts is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
233 |
8.5 (new) |
Include
a new ‘Other Elements…’ sub-section referring to historic roads,
paths and other transport routes and surfaces, new roads, paths and car
parks, including discussion of what conservation processes are most
appropriate for each. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
233 |
8.5 (new) |
Include
a new ‘Other Elements…’ sub-section referring to Threatened Species
Recovery Plans, conservation of exotic flora and conservation of
significant cultural landscapes and spatial layouts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
235 |
8.6.4 |
It
would be useful to identify some priorities for future research: regarding
site history, this should include connections with former Cowpers Wharf
Quarantine Depot in Woolloomooloo, QS role in bubonic plague research, 20C
associations with the military, 20C use for non-quarantine detentions
(refugees, boat people), and local associations/affiliations with the
place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
238 |
8.9 |
Reference needs to be made to managing the
archival resources in the Resource Centre in accordance with the State Records Act 1998. – also applies to s9.9, policy 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
238 |
8.9 |
Reference must be made to preparation of an
annual report by any lessee or, if not leased, then by the site managers,
to the DG of NPWS on implementation of the CMP and effectiveness of s57
exemptions in conserving heritage significance of the whole item and its
elements, with the annual report to be tabled at the Heritage Council. This needs to be linked to s9.9, policy 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
242 |
9.3, policy 7 |
Reference should be made to the Heritage
Council’s Aboriginal Heritage Committee as a body to be consulted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
244 |
9.3, policy 13 |
The Landscape Management Guidelines should also
cover any divergence from species recovery plans to conserve culturally or
aesthetically significant exotic plantings and other landscape elements
– this needs to be linked to s9.4, policies 5 and 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
245 |
9.4, policy 2 |
Amend sentence listing supplementary conservation
documents from … |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
245* |
9.4, policy 2 |
The listing of supplementary conservation plans
should also include ‘quarantine cemeteries’ or, if these are to be
included within the archaeological management plans, then this should be
specifically stated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
245 |
9.4, policy 2 |
The listing of supplementary conservation
documents refers to ‘archaeological management plans’ – it needs to
be specifically stated in this and all subsequent references to such plans
that they are to include the Marine Precinct and potential maritime
archaeological resources in that precinct. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
247* |
9.4, policy 8 |
A site plan needs to be included that shows …those
sites where former buildings were located, as well as any other sites
where new buildings and works are permissible.
Also, reference needs to be made to bulk, materials and height as
well as scale and form (see also comments on ss. 8.4.3 and 8.4.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
248 |
9.4, policy 9 |
The proposed guidelines for heritage objects
should also include: assessment in the context of rooms/spaces and
other objects/arrangements; in context of historic themes identified for
the site; re-use and interpretation of objects; management strategies
during site conservation works; consultation as part of preparation of
planning documents for objects; acquisition and disposal policies;
cooperative use/care of objects owned by other organisations/individuals;
and concordance with Burra Charter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
250 |
9.5, policies 3 & 4 |
Each
policy must include a clear definition of ‘optimum adaptive
reuse’/’optimum compatible adaptive reuse’ to enable a proper
evaluation of what constitutes each. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
252 |
9.6, policy 1 |
Reference needs to be made to balancing the need
to provide security for movable objects and historic inscriptions with the
opportunity to provide public access. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
251 |
9.6, policy 2 |
A further dot-point could be included referring
to connections between the site and the Berry’s Bay and Cowper’s Wharf
depots within the context of the site’s historical themes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
252 |
9.6, policy 2 |
Reference needs to be made to use/reuse of
rooms/spaces and movable objects as part of interpretation programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
253 |
9.6, policy 5 |
Reference should also be made in this section to
maritime archaeology potential. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
255 |
9.9, policy 4 |
Reference to implementation of the annual
reporting requirement needs to be included here (see comment on s8.9). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
259 |
10.3, ‘recovery plans’ |
Include within this strategy or as a separate
(new) strategy the establishment of baseline data for biodiversity (flora
& fauna) and geodiversity to enable future impacts to be assessed –
to be included in One Year Program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
257-260 |
New |
Include a reference to the development of a
strategy to assess visitor carrying capacity, with reference to the CRC
for Sustainable Tourism – to be included in One Year Program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
258 |
10.3 ‘movable strategy’ |
Reference needs to be made to basing conservation
of movable objects on Burra Charter principles, and include the impacts of
removal and storage of objects on the significant spaces/rooms and
relationships. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
258 |
10.3 ‘interpretation
plan’ |
Reference needs to be made to NPWS Interpretive
Policy Guidelines, and to including Aboriginal, natural and cultural
values and significance; as well as reference to educational approaches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
260-264 |
10.4 |
Include reference to a strategy to identify and
assess the significance of the site to relevant ethnic communities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
New* |
New |
A policy regarding public accessibility of the
endorsed CMP is needed (e.g. copies will be lodged in State Library, Manly
Library, NPWS Library, QS Resource Centre) |
* - Indicates Heritage Council comments provided on
the 1992 document that still need to be addressed.